Marine Fisheries Management Reform a Hot Topic at Fishing Tackle Trade Show

Recreational- and conservation-group leaders call for changes in federal management to better accommodate recreational fisheries.

July 18, 2016
ICAST federal fisheries management talk
Thousands of people working in the fishing-tackle industry attended this year’s ICAST show in Orlando. Recreational fishing contributes $70 billion annually to the American economy. Doug Olander

ORLANDO, Florida — At last week’s ICAST, the world’s largest sportfishing trade show, recreational fishing and conservation group leaders revealed the preliminary findings from a series of collaborative workshops on alternative approaches to federal fisheries management.

The same broad coalition behind the 2014 landmark report on recreational fisheries management worked closely with NOAA Fisheries, state game and fish managers, biologists, and researchers to identify ways to revise the current approach. Right now, federal fisheries managers set catch limits for both commercial and recreational sectors in a way that undervalues recreational fishermen and their $70 billion contribution to America’s economy. Innovative new solutions could give anglers more predictable seasons, boost conservation and improve local economies in coastal communities and beyond.

“Although recreational anglers only catch two percent of the total fish harvested in U.S. waters, we create almost as many jobs as the commercial fishing industry” — 455,000 jobs, in fact, said Mike Nussman, president and CEO of the American Sportfishing Association, the trade group that produces the ICAST conference and events.


This year’s was their biggest show yet, with 13,000 attendees walking a 650,000-square-foot showroom packed with close to 600 exhibitors — a perfect backdrop for a discussion of new ideas.

The first workshop, facilitated by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission in Tampa this May, was geared toward identifying where existing federal fisheries management approaches fail to adequately accommodate the unique nature of recreational fisheries and specific ways to address these issues. The group discussed alternatives that are rooted in existing management practices currently used for fish and waterfowl at the state level, such as: Managing for a harvest rate, rather than a quota that must be tracked in real time.

  • Spatial management, or allowing fishing out to certain depths or distances from shore, while making deeper waters off-limits to recreational harvest so brood stock can replenish.

  • Looking at temporary and long-term allocation shifts between the recreational and commercial sectors, which might include shifting some species from recreational to commercial allocation and others from commercial to recreational.

  • Developing new programs to gather better recreational harvest data or take advantage of existing voluntary harvest data.

  • Reducing release mortality with new technology or better education on existing tools.


These initial conclusions were presented to congressional staff and representatives of the environmental community at a second workshop this June in Washington D.C. The group also discussed the potential legislative and regulatory changes needed to achieve these possible alternatives. Some solutions possibly require changes to the existing federal fisheries law, but others could be addressed through collaboration with NOAA Fisheries.


More News