Close

Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member?

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

September 16, 2011

Sport Fishing Line Test 2011

How 76 different 20-pound fishing lines stack up in break- and knot-strength testing

Diameter

In most cases, manufacturers’ stated diameter for monos/fluoros varied marginally, if at all, from what my electronic calipers measured. And, somewhat surprisingly, where discrepant, the measured sample often proved smaller than the spool’s stated diameter.

For braided lines also, the difference between stated and measured diameter differed less than I would have expected, especially considering that braids can be trickier to measure. In a few cases, diameter measured much less than stated.

In many respects, the thinner a line for a given strength, the better. Smaller lines allow more capacity on the spool, are likely to cast farther and easier, and offer less water resistance. On the other hand, thinner lines generally offer less abrasion resistance, since any scrape or nick takes out a larger ­proportional chunk of them.

Also, this chart indicates whether each line is a monofilament or a fluorocarbon, and whether it’s sold as a main line or (in spools with less line) as leader.

 

 Actual Diameter | Strength to Diameter Ratio | Actual Break Strength | Knot Strength | Cost Per Yard

Comments (5) Post A Comment

When measuring knot strength, were the results a percentage of the actual breaking strength of the line or the claimed breaking strength of 20lbs?

0 Good Comment?

I think abrasion tests don't have to be that scientific. I did my own as in the site shown. http://home.comcast.net/~estero69/site/
When you hook a fish the line can abraid on many different things.

0 Good Comment?

Good point, PiR2 is a more appropriate measure of strength per unit

0 Good Comment?

from chestersg50 on 09.17.11 at 11:12AM ET.
"it should be strength to cross sectional area" Good Point, PiR2

0 Good Comment?

Your strength to diamiter comparison is not valid it should be strength to cross sectional area, the line that is second on your list has a higher tensile than the one you say came out top,

+1 Good Comment?
post a comment
  • Anonymous comments will appear after it has been approved by a moderator.
  • Login or Register Now for your comment to appear immediately.
Please note: your comment will appear after it has been approved by a moderator. If you login or register your comment will appear immediately
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use