Close

Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member?

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

July 23, 2012

Exclusive Interview: Obama Talks Fisheries

Q&A with President Obama on key fisheries issues


Issue 4 - Changes in Noaa/Recreational Fisheries Management

Background: For many years, there has been debate about whether Commerce is the right federal department to contain the National Marine Fisheries Service. Certainly the recreational-fishing community has long noted the agency’s origins in and continuing emphasis on developing commercial fishing/fisheries, part of the reason that the trust recreational anglers have in NOAA Fisheries to manage them and their fisheries is at an all-time low.

SPORT FISHING: Would your administration act to move the management of saltwater fisheries into another department, such as the Department of the Interior, and/or in some other way make NOAA Fisheries more responsive to the particular needs of its recreational-angling constituency?

OBAMA: I have proposed moving NOAA to the Department of Interior, streamlining these two agencies with similar missions to make them more efficient and effective for taxpayers and their customers, including the recreational-fishing community. Sportsmen and the organizations that represent them have a long and successful history of working with the Department of Interior to help guide natural-resource management in a manner that balances maximum access with scientific management.

Along with that transition, I am committed to supporting the programs vital to America’s fishing industry and sport fishermen, and ensuring that science remains the foundation of ocean management. That is why I will continue to support targeted investments in fisheries research and observation. These programs support a fishing economy built to last.


Issue 5 - Why Angers Should Vote for You This Year

SPORT FISHING: Within 500 words, tell this country’s 13 million recreational saltwater anglers why it’s in their best interest to vote for you.

OBAMA: I am committed to ensuring that our nation’s vast natural resources are used responsibly, and that we maintain healthy oceans and coasts. We have created or enhanced more than 540 public coastal recreation areas, protected more than 54,000 acres of coastlines and restored more than 5,200 acres of coastal habitat. And we are working to ensure the integrity of the waters Americans rely on every day for drinking, swimming, and fishing by supporting initiatives that restore our rivers and watersheds.

We know that sportsmen have always been some of the strongest advocates for conservation, and recreational fishermen will always have a seat at the table in my administration. We have created a new senior adviser position within NOAA focused on recreational fishing, hosted a recreational fishing summit, developed an Action Agenda based on input from the summit, and met 80 percent of the near-term goals established by that agenda within a year. The recommendations and subsequent actions that have resulted from our work in this area will pay great dividends to both our marine environment and our coastal economy.

I am committed to pursuing strategies that encourage conservation of our national lands and waters. We are taking important steps to restore treasured landscapes that support recreation across the country. We kicked off the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, the largest investment in the Great Lakes in two decades, which is targeting ecological problems such as invasive species, toxic hot spots, polluted runoff from farms and cities, and declining wildlife habitat. We are cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay, establishing a “pollution diet” for the Bay that will help restore the natural habitat for fish and other wildlife in Maryland and Virginia. We have also invested more than $1.4 billion in Everglades’ restoration, helping to keep my promise to fully fund the federal partnership for Everglades’ restoration and helping restore tens of thousands of acres, which will serve as a sanctuary for native Florida plants and wildlife. We are also directing additional funding to Gulf Coast restoration to further bring back the fisheries and coastal ecosystems, which are still recovering in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon spill.

When it comes to recreational fishing, I will continue to prioritize wise investments in science and management initiatives that result in more accurate assessments of the state of our fish stocks, and ultimately provide more fishing opportunity. I will encourage the rapid transition of data to policy, and a balanced approach that permits adequate access to fishing today while we ensure that fish are here tomorrow for our children and our grandchildren to enjoy.

Comments (29) Post A Comment

Any Angler who support this president is not paying attention to whom he appoints and the direction of the leviathan in Washington DC in regards to Marine protected areas...you can't fish the beach on many miles of california coast now due the environmentalists whom support this president with all they got.

What about Jane Lubachenko who is all for catch shares which no only plays favorites but will destroy coastal communities across the US. What about fuel for you boat ...still like paying $5 a gallon at the dock.

I cannot see how any thinking american could vote for this guy again...pt barnum was right it seems by some of the comments I read here.

More government involvement in sport fishing will destroy the sport for our children..when is enough enough? I had to sign up for a saltwater registry for the last 3 years do you think I even got a questionnaire from the govt..nope no phone call either then why do it..so they can count the revenue (taxes) that will be used against you.

Government can only control criminals and when one does not have enough of them, they make them by making laws too numerous and too complicated so you will always be in violation and that is when you no longer have freedom.

Think about it America....can you survive 4 more of this without president executive order having to worry about reelection....you will not recognize this country if that happens.

Mark my words!

+1 Good Comment?

We need our president to respond with vigor in looking into this problem. There are many a fisherman in my state that just refuse to gas a boat, buy any new fishing equipment, and let along ask his buddies to help pay $1000.00 to hlp pay for the expenses to go into the gulf for two red Snapper. It is utterly rediculous to travel sixty miles into the gulf to retreive two fish. On a recent overnight trip, five friends and i fished several rigs in the gulf some sixty miles out, and after catching our limit of two fish in about an hour, we continue to fish and the only fish we could catch were RED SNAPPER. IN FACT we caught over 100 red snapper, and may I add, successfully released all but twelve of them OUR LIMIT. The Snapper all weighed over 20 pounds. I fished when the limits were eight per fisherman, and i have never seen snapper so Vibrant. This trip was with men who could afford a good trip, but not all of those people who want to fish, cant affort to sport fish, and they would not get the chance to fish for sport, because they simply cannot afford to do so. we really need the help of each and every man, woman and child to make this happen.
I am one of a few BLACK CAPTAINS THAT FISH OUT OF PASCAGOULA, and many of my friends that would go out to catch Snapper, refuse to try to make a trip for such a meager haul.

+1 Good Comment?

Well I have to admit that I am perplexed at why Romney wanted to decline a response to these questions. However I find Obama's response mere rhetoric from a desperate President that has a record of taking liberty with our liberties and manipulating the constitution into a foreign piece of paper. Any administration that wants to take away our freedoms rather than protect them will not get my vote. I feel he said it all when he stated that the offshore rigs could be a danger.... meaning he has no intention of leaving the rigs in place and is favor of blowing them up along with all the fish that live around them already! An entire eco system isn't important to him, it's the word oil that is! Anything and everything associated with oil according to this administration, they are against. They don't care if they kill more species in one blast than any fisherman or woman could catch in a year! It sickens me to think that anyone could vote this predator of freedom back in. Everything he ran on .... I will close Gitmo? I will have a surplus? I will not raise taxes on the middle income? Really are you blind or just stuck on stupid?

+1 Good Comment?

As usual the President answers questions with straight and thoughtful answers and the mindless radicals ignore what he says preferring to spread their personal and narrow opinions fed to them by their favorite cable TV personalities who are paid to present one ideology.
When one person takes the time to respond respectfully to your questions and the other person respectfully ignores you - how could you think the one who ignores you respects you?
Sounds more like battered wife syndrome than actually thinking on your own.
Keep following those who profit by your choice to ignorant and we are all doomed – fisheries and otherwise.

+3 Good Comment?

Tre – Your partisan approach to the issues underlines the root cause to so many of our country’s problems these days. With such a clear record in hand regarding President Obama’s lack of concern for our civil liberties and efforts to socialize our country, bolstered with the fact that every organization that promotes the curtailment of hunting and fishing whenever and wherever possible, are some of his most ardent supporters, I question your intent on seeing our rights preserved.

Fabricating lame partisan comments like…..“I usually hear comments from the Republicans and their supporters along the lines that the world is too large to be effected by human activity and the earth exists to be exploited by man.”…..is the most ludicrous statement on this board.

Paul Rogers’ post exemplifies our country’s problem where he writes…” we just need to make sure there is follow thru and not just a bunch of unkept promises.”….The point is: If we reelect President Obama then we obviously don’t care about un kept promises.

0 Good Comment?

JeeeeeZ, Guys, wake-up they (both of them) are being run by special interest groups- Where and how do you think the money flows- Name one political Leader in the past 40 yrs who wasn't being owned or ran by some special interest group???? D.C. is so corrupted it could not run any other way! Wake-up America, it is not going to get any better, no matter who gets elected next, because some powers-that-are put the hopeful power-to-be there. And as the current President (and many before him) has done, promises are easy to make and break, then they are to meet and keep !!

+1 Good Comment?

I sincerely doubt that Obama really has any intention of doing right by the Americans that enjoy fishing. More Federal involvement, regulations and outright mis-management along with the bureaucratic nightmare it will expand is not what is needed. Only more taxpayer cost and more unneeded government personnel is the result of this.
Obama wil not have my vote!

0 Good Comment?

Ellen Peel was an excellent choice. In addition, I'm in favor of having science and "in the field" advocates reach a common consensus of the state of fish stocks and environmental stressors rather than only relying on one over the other.
I would much rather have someone in charge that has environment and conservation as a primary concern than someone who might ditch these issues precious to us in the name of leveling it, paving it, building on it, or digging it up just to satisfy the wants of big business and the desire to do anything for a buck.
Romney's decision to not respond frankly tells me everything I need to know, which is he can't make a decision on something that he may get called to the mat later when he reverses his stance. It's been his modis operandi. Gutless and non-committal is not the way of we outdoorsmen and women.
The President has my vote to re-elect.

+1 Good Comment?

It is unfortunate that the Romney camp failed to respond , however obama responded with the same lies he has been using since taking office.

he states that scientific methods should be used for establishing quotas and yet ignores the available studies and gives commercial fishing the vast majority of seasons and quotas. His policies have directly led to many hardships in the recreational fishing sector, including the loss of many jobs.

I have nothing to thank obama for.

Stephen Fleming

+1 Good Comment?

It's good to hear our President's view on our concern's regarding our lives and the ocean's protection for our children's future. You got my vote again
Mr. President

-1 Good Comment?

The answers to the questions sound good to me, but words without actions wont do much for saltwater anglers. The thing President Obama has done that will get my vote was naming Ellen Peel the Us Commissioner to iccat. From what I have read about her he wont be able to not hear the voice of recreational fisherman.

0 Good Comment?

Thanks for at least answering Obama, even if your answer was the predictable political doublespeak that we're all so used to. And thank you, Romney, for showing us that recreational fishermen aren't even worth your response. I guess that fishing isn't the economy and thus doesn't matter.

0 Good Comment?

Anyone who thinks this guy is going to do anything for fishermen needs the hook removed from his brain. He thinks anyone who owns a boat is in the priveledged class and has not paid his fair share and its his job to get it out of them. He blew it big time in the gulf with BP and will compound every problem we face because he is about giving speeches rather than understanding the issues and formulating realistic policies.

+1 Good Comment?

maybe Mr Obama will give our Federally restricted waters to China,North Korea or Iran to take care of, He is already allowing foreign governments to destroy our fisheries by overfishing and polution.In my opinion the only thing Mr Obama knows about fishing and fisheries is what is written on a menue.

0 Good Comment?

I for one completly understand why mr Romney would not answer this survey it would only be used to make him look like he is pro industry and would be a environintal threat .the data from any survey can and will be twisted to damage mr romneys reputation .survays are the ammo that was used agains us to disproportionately close fishing in the first place .this is a stupid idea and I am against this politacal nonsense it will back fire on people that want to responsibly utilizeand protect the natural resources .

0 Good Comment?

Al the political trash in the response no answers
Just typical Obama dodging the answer he should be giving
Same old crap special interests pad candidates
Money chests Obama and Romney I'll say one more thing
Romney did not respond cuz he would lie too

0 Good Comment?

Though Synergy poses a great question that should have been asked, I fully disagree that Romney will be less suseptable to the money and influence of big business and special interests. Though the Democrats have certainly shown that they are not immune to those influences, the Republicans have demonstrated that they are the party most willing to allow policy to be driven by $$$. And his blind assumption that Romney's lack of response is better than Obama's response is ludicrous. Romney has shown himself to be a weathervane for the Republican party--herever their whims blow, he points in that direction. And I have not heard a single word from him or his party when it comes to preserving the environment. I usually hear comments from the Republicans and their supporters along the lines that the world is too large to be effected by human activity and the earth exists to be exploited by man. So unless Romney responds, I believe it best to assume the worst from him.

0 Good Comment?

Why should we believe any thing Mr Obama has to say about our oceans and inland waters.He has lied about so many other things how can we believe his on this issue. Mr Obama answers questions with answers that he thinks we want to hear,he will do and say anything to keep his current job as president after all it is a step up from anything that he has done in the past. I complement Sport Fishing Magazine for attempting to get both parties to speak on the subject but all you got was a disapointing refusal from Romney and BS from Obama At least we can all see what kind of support we will have from our friends in Washington,OUR COUNTRY IS IN A REAL MESS ---GOD HELP US.

0 Good Comment?

Thank you, President Obama for the answers to the questions. You do NOT have my vote!

Your administration’s intent seems to be more focused on controlling, restricting, and limiting rather than applying appropriate and pertinent science to environmental and sporting concerns. Money driven special interest agendas steer our state and federal governments nowadays, with NOAA being just one example of the corruption affecting our right to enjoy our resources.

Whatever President Romney will do, or would have stated here, is better than the heading you have us on.

Considering this is a federal level presidential campaign interview, why didn't SF pose this question: In the new administration, what will the US be doing to address the decimation of the world’s pelagic fish stocks by foreign countries?

+1 Good Comment?

I do not feel comfortable with anything Obama says ,he does not
Know beans about fish and will tell you what ever you want to hear .
This is an election year and he has been campaigning all his life and has not kept any of his promises .Does not hold water !

0 Good Comment?

Thanks for the answers.. we just need to make sure there is follow thru and not just a bunch of unkept promises

0 Good Comment?

Thanks for the answers.. we just need to make sure there is follow thru and not just a bunch of unkept promises

0 Good Comment?

Where did Obama get all this knowlage on these matters. He is the most uneducated president we have. He has good writers to write his comments.
Do you really think he knowes anything about the conservation that has been going on in the last 30 years. I don't think so.
He's just looking for votes.
O yes Rommey would of done the same also.

0 Good Comment?

No mention of the pending asian Carp invasion that would kill the great Lakes fisheries.

0 Good Comment?

Lots of hot air, non answers and promises. Nothing new here, just typical political BS with no action on behalf on anglers.

0 Good Comment?

So it sounds as though nothing has changed.

NOAA was taken to court by the RFA for using "flawed data" to initiate emergency closures. What ever happened to the NOAA investigation of their enforcement department destroying documents and the misuse of funds obtained from fishing penalties?

Now each state has been forced to initiate a fishing license / registry program for salt-water fishing. How many people have been contacted to supply current fishing information?

Louisiana & Texas are extending their territorial waters to over-ride federal restrictions.

If you believe these statements, I've got some ocean front property in Nebraska that I'd like to sell you.

George Neuberger

+1 Good Comment?

President Obama, we need fast action on the Idle Iron issue, before more rigs are senselessly removed from the gulf, once they are gone they are gone. Moratorium now! I am a diehard and faithful supporter of President Obama and am believing you will direct some attention and resources to this issue YESTERDAY!

-1 Good Comment?

Thank you, President Obama for the answers to the questions. You have my vote!

+1 Good Comment?

And yet Obama knew that large campaign donator, EDF wanted Jane Lubchenco, their Vice Chair at the time, to be put into the position of leadership over the Federal Fisheries, so as to promote their Catch Share scheme from as they said, the "Top-Down". She had to resign from EDF to get the appointment, and quickly proceeded to spend hundreds of millions of dollars pushing this agenda.

This past 3 1/2 years has seen more closures and Catch Share schemes imposed, despite the great growth in most fish stocks, and the declaration that Overfishing has ended! Access by the private angler to recreational saltwater fishing has diminished despite some of the best fish stocks in decades! Since his administration allowed this, is he now saying he's going to change it? Maybe this is simply some of the "Change" he is waiting for his second term to get around to!

+1 Good Comment?
post a comment
  • Anonymous comments will appear after it has been approved by a moderator.
  • Login or Register Now for your comment to appear immediately.
Please note: your comment will appear after it has been approved by a moderator. If you login or register your comment will appear immediately
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use