Close

Login

Logging In
Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

not a member?

Signing up could earn you gear and it helps to keep offensive content off of our site.

July 23, 2012

Exclusive Interview: Obama Talks Fisheries

Q&A with President Obama on key fisheries issues

In May, both the Obama and Romney campaigns agreed to answer a series of questions on fisheries issues/policy vital to U.S. recreational fishermen as part of an exclusive interview to be published in the September/October issue of Sport Fishing. By June, both campaigns informed us that their presumptive candidate and staff were working on their answers, and promised we would have them by our absolute deadline. Unfortunately, neither campaign kept that promise, as we received neither response in time for publication in SF. We then informed both campaigns that we could still get their thoughts on the record and into public view via our web site.

The result:

The Obama campaign provided us with the president’s official response, and you can read it here.

The Romney campaign said it had decided to decline this opportunity. That is why you are seeing only one of the presumptive candidate’s answers.

It had been our primary objective from the start, as we pointed out to each campaign, to let America’s 12 million saltwater anglers see both presumptive candidates’ responses to critical fisheries issues.

Each campaign had the same opportunity to speak to us. And we informed both campaigns very clearly that while we hoped both would respond, we would run only one response if that was all we could get.

We regret that both presidential campaigns didn’t take advantage of this opportunity, but you still have the unique chance here to read (and comment on) one candidate’s thoughts on vital fisheries issues.

 
Issue 1 - Red Snapper Quotas

Background: Red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico and black sea bass in the South Atlantic have become iconic to many recreational fishermen as examples of federal fisheries management gone completely off the tracks. For some years, empirical evidence — and, more recently, statistical evidence as well — has established beyond doubt the great abundance of red snapper in the Gulf, where ironically, anglers faced their shortest season ever, a mere 40 days. Now Louisiana is moving to defy federal law and join Texas in setting separate, longer seasons in its waters. Black sea bass stocks in the South Atlantic are responding to management and rapidly rebuilding. As with snapper in the Gulf, recreational anglers are encountering them more frequently and catching their meager quota far more quickly, resulting in long closures of the fishery and compounding an already difficult offshore angling environment reeling from closures.

SPORT FISHING:
What, if anything, would your administration do to a) give managers the resources (funding) to assess fish stocks such as red snapper/black sea bass as well as the ability to manage them according to current conditions; and b) reduce the apparent disparity between rebounding stocks and the opportunity anglers are being given to participate in those fisheries?


OBAMA: The long-term health of ocean fisheries and other marine life allows saltwater anglers to enjoy rewarding days on the water, commercial fishermen to earn a good living, and residents living along our coasts to experience a good quality of life. My administration is committed to finding solutions that can allow anglers to have longer and more predictable seasons. Management based on sound science is the best way to strike a balance between those who rely on these waters today and those who will use them tomorrow. In order to achieve this balance, we are assessing fish stocks more frequently, consulting with fishermen and other local experts, and getting more accurate counts as a result. When science shows increases in catch limits are warranted — as with the red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico, where we’ve increased the amount of red snapper that fishermen can take every year for the past four years — we have acted swiftly to adjust them.

This administration has also broken new ground to get much more accurate and timely information from and for our recreational fishermen. We have created a new angler-driven initiative, the Marine Recreational Information Program, to count and report marine recreational activities. It will not only produce better estimates, but will do so through a process grounded in transparency, accountability and engagement. My administration is also working with recreational fishing organizations, the country’s leading fishery scientists and state agencies on a bottom-up approach to conserving our fisheries. Through FishSmart, we are helping recreational anglers do what they’ve always been willing to do: adjust their fishing techniques and equipment to conserve fish for the long-term health of their sport and our oceans.

We are also investing in more assessments — doubling funding over the past three years — so we have the most accurate data possible on the health of our fisheries. In doing so, we are working with partners across the country, bringing saltwater anglers into the process of counting the fish in our oceans to contribute to the science that builds our policies. The results of these policies are catch limits that benefit us all and will lead to healthy, sustainable populations.


Issue 2 - Federal Destruction of Gulf Oil Rigs

Background: In 2010, the U.S. Department of the Interior issued an order that nonproducing oil rigs be removed from the Gulf of Mexico within five years of meeting the definition of “no longer useful for operations.” Sport Fishing has been particularly outspoken in its opposition to that policy and in support of Sen. David Vitters’ Rigs-to-Reefs bill that would prevent DOI’s “idle iron” directive from immediately removing approximately 650 rigs that already meet that definition — rigs covered with living coral reefs that the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council plans to designate as Essential Fish Habitat and Habitat Areas of Particular Concern.

SPORT FISHING: The clock on this issue is ticking: Would your administration intervene in the DOI’s directive in order to protect this marine habitat? If so, when and in what fashion?


OBAMA: My administration has absolutely heard the concerns of recreational fishermen over the “idle iron” policy, and we have convened a number of interagency meetings to review the policy and make adjustments as necessary. Obsolete oil and gas structures can serve as thriving coral reefs that support entire ecosystems, and we know that they also provide some of the most valued recreational fishing grounds in the Gulf of Mexico. At the same time, abandoned wells are not harmless: Even properly sealed wells can fail over the decades, jeopardizing fish habitats. We are actively engaged with recreational fishing organizations, coastal states, and the oil industry to encourage the reuse of offshore oil and gas structures where appropriate, and to ensure healthy fish and habitats, and abundant fishing opportunities. We are working to address this issue as quickly as possible and are committed to finding a solution.


Issue 3 - National Ocean Policy

Background: Access to fishing has been one of the primary concerns among saltwater recreational anglers for years. They feel particularly threatened by the coastal and marine spatial planning process of the National Ocean Policy established by executive order in 2010, a process in which recreational fishing has not been included as a national priority. There remain gaping uncertainties about what this might portend for sport fishermen, who feel their needs have been ignored, stung by similar disenfranchisement in planning for California’s Marine Life Protection Act and Florida’s Biscayne Bay National Park. The House recently voted to cut off funding for the NOP pending clarifications.

SPORT FISHING: What reassurances regarding a National Ocean Policy and its effect on access to fishing could you offer the recreational-fishing community?

OBAMA: Responsibly managing our nation’s oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes will keep them healthy for their users today and tomorrow. We are working to ensure that fishermen can access the local waters they care most about and that those waters support healthy, vibrant populations of fish.

By establishing a National Ocean Policy, I made it a priority of the federal government to ensure a proactive approach to improving the conservation of the ocean, our coasts and the Great Lakes. We are developing regional plans that bring the states together with regional stakeholders to make sure everyone has the opportunity to enjoy this shared resource, and that residents in each region can tailor its management to suit their local needs. This policy cuts away red tape and redundancy to best serve the local communities that depend on our oceans and waters.

Some claim that this kind of planning is intended to deprive fishermen of access to our ocean waters. Nothing could be further from the truth. Instead, our goal is to allow all users of the ocean — including recreational fishermen — to have a voice in how our ocean waters are managed.

Recreational fishermen have an important role to play in this policy, and we have gone to great lengths to ensure their voices are heard as part of the process. We’ve asked each region to bring fishermen into the decision-making process to create more opportunities for sport fishermen to share what works for them in the parts of the coast they know best.

Comments (30) Post A Comment

I believe that avoiding highly processed foods may be the first step in order to lose weight. They can taste great, but refined foods possess very little vitamins and minerals, making you try to eat more simply to have enough power to get throughout the day. If you're constantly having these foods, converting to whole grains and other complex carbohydrates will assist you to have more electricity while having less. Great blog post.
top nursing programs

0 Good Comment?

Any Angler who support this president is not paying attention to whom he appoints and the direction of the leviathan in Washington DC in regards to Marine protected areas...you can't fish the beach on many miles of california coast now due the environmentalists whom support this president with all they got.

What about Jane Lubachenko who is all for catch shares which no only plays favorites but will destroy coastal communities across the US. What about fuel for you boat ...still like paying $5 a gallon at the dock.

I cannot see how any thinking american could vote for this guy again...pt barnum was right it seems by some of the comments I read here.

More government involvement in sport fishing will destroy the sport for our children..when is enough enough? I had to sign up for a saltwater registry for the last 3 years do you think I even got a questionnaire from the govt..nope no phone call either then why do it..so they can count the revenue (taxes) that will be used against you.

Government can only control criminals and when one does not have enough of them, they make them by making laws too numerous and too complicated so you will always be in violation and that is when you no longer have freedom.

Think about it America....can you survive 4 more of this without president executive order having to worry about reelection....you will not recognize this country if that happens.

Mark my words!

+1 Good Comment?

We need our president to respond with vigor in looking into this problem. There are many a fisherman in my state that just refuse to gas a boat, buy any new fishing equipment, and let along ask his buddies to help pay $1000.00 to hlp pay for the expenses to go into the gulf for two red Snapper. It is utterly rediculous to travel sixty miles into the gulf to retreive two fish. On a recent overnight trip, five friends and i fished several rigs in the gulf some sixty miles out, and after catching our limit of two fish in about an hour, we continue to fish and the only fish we could catch were RED SNAPPER. IN FACT we caught over 100 red snapper, and may I add, successfully released all but twelve of them OUR LIMIT. The Snapper all weighed over 20 pounds. I fished when the limits were eight per fisherman, and i have never seen snapper so Vibrant. This trip was with men who could afford a good trip, but not all of those people who want to fish, cant affort to sport fish, and they would not get the chance to fish for sport, because they simply cannot afford to do so. we really need the help of each and every man, woman and child to make this happen.
I am one of a few BLACK CAPTAINS THAT FISH OUT OF PASCAGOULA, and many of my friends that would go out to catch Snapper, refuse to try to make a trip for such a meager haul.

+1 Good Comment?

Well I have to admit that I am perplexed at why Romney wanted to decline a response to these questions. However I find Obama's response mere rhetoric from a desperate President that has a record of taking liberty with our liberties and manipulating the constitution into a foreign piece of paper. Any administration that wants to take away our freedoms rather than protect them will not get my vote. I feel he said it all when he stated that the offshore rigs could be a danger.... meaning he has no intention of leaving the rigs in place and is favor of blowing them up along with all the fish that live around them already! An entire eco system isn't important to him, it's the word oil that is! Anything and everything associated with oil according to this administration, they are against. They don't care if they kill more species in one blast than any fisherman or woman could catch in a year! It sickens me to think that anyone could vote this predator of freedom back in. Everything he ran on .... I will close Gitmo? I will have a surplus? I will not raise taxes on the middle income? Really are you blind or just stuck on stupid?

+1 Good Comment?

As usual the President answers questions with straight and thoughtful answers and the mindless radicals ignore what he says preferring to spread their personal and narrow opinions fed to them by their favorite cable TV personalities who are paid to present one ideology.
When one person takes the time to respond respectfully to your questions and the other person respectfully ignores you - how could you think the one who ignores you respects you?
Sounds more like battered wife syndrome than actually thinking on your own.
Keep following those who profit by your choice to ignorant and we are all doomed – fisheries and otherwise.

+3 Good Comment?

Tre – Your partisan approach to the issues underlines the root cause to so many of our country’s problems these days. With such a clear record in hand regarding President Obama’s lack of concern for our civil liberties and efforts to socialize our country, bolstered with the fact that every organization that promotes the curtailment of hunting and fishing whenever and wherever possible, are some of his most ardent supporters, I question your intent on seeing our rights preserved.

Fabricating lame partisan comments like…..“I usually hear comments from the Republicans and their supporters along the lines that the world is too large to be effected by human activity and the earth exists to be exploited by man.”…..is the most ludicrous statement on this board.

Paul Rogers’ post exemplifies our country’s problem where he writes…” we just need to make sure there is follow thru and not just a bunch of unkept promises.”….The point is: If we reelect President Obama then we obviously don’t care about un kept promises.

0 Good Comment?

JeeeeeZ, Guys, wake-up they (both of them) are being run by special interest groups- Where and how do you think the money flows- Name one political Leader in the past 40 yrs who wasn't being owned or ran by some special interest group???? D.C. is so corrupted it could not run any other way! Wake-up America, it is not going to get any better, no matter who gets elected next, because some powers-that-are put the hopeful power-to-be there. And as the current President (and many before him) has done, promises are easy to make and break, then they are to meet and keep !!

+1 Good Comment?

I sincerely doubt that Obama really has any intention of doing right by the Americans that enjoy fishing. More Federal involvement, regulations and outright mis-management along with the bureaucratic nightmare it will expand is not what is needed. Only more taxpayer cost and more unneeded government personnel is the result of this.
Obama wil not have my vote!

0 Good Comment?

Ellen Peel was an excellent choice. In addition, I'm in favor of having science and "in the field" advocates reach a common consensus of the state of fish stocks and environmental stressors rather than only relying on one over the other.
I would much rather have someone in charge that has environment and conservation as a primary concern than someone who might ditch these issues precious to us in the name of leveling it, paving it, building on it, or digging it up just to satisfy the wants of big business and the desire to do anything for a buck.
Romney's decision to not respond frankly tells me everything I need to know, which is he can't make a decision on something that he may get called to the mat later when he reverses his stance. It's been his modis operandi. Gutless and non-committal is not the way of we outdoorsmen and women.
The President has my vote to re-elect.

+1 Good Comment?

It is unfortunate that the Romney camp failed to respond , however obama responded with the same lies he has been using since taking office.

he states that scientific methods should be used for establishing quotas and yet ignores the available studies and gives commercial fishing the vast majority of seasons and quotas. His policies have directly led to many hardships in the recreational fishing sector, including the loss of many jobs.

I have nothing to thank obama for.

Stephen Fleming

+1 Good Comment?

It's good to hear our President's view on our concern's regarding our lives and the ocean's protection for our children's future. You got my vote again
Mr. President

-1 Good Comment?

The answers to the questions sound good to me, but words without actions wont do much for saltwater anglers. The thing President Obama has done that will get my vote was naming Ellen Peel the Us Commissioner to iccat. From what I have read about her he wont be able to not hear the voice of recreational fisherman.

0 Good Comment?

Thanks for at least answering Obama, even if your answer was the predictable political doublespeak that we're all so used to. And thank you, Romney, for showing us that recreational fishermen aren't even worth your response. I guess that fishing isn't the economy and thus doesn't matter.

0 Good Comment?

Anyone who thinks this guy is going to do anything for fishermen needs the hook removed from his brain. He thinks anyone who owns a boat is in the priveledged class and has not paid his fair share and its his job to get it out of them. He blew it big time in the gulf with BP and will compound every problem we face because he is about giving speeches rather than understanding the issues and formulating realistic policies.

+1 Good Comment?

maybe Mr Obama will give our Federally restricted waters to China,North Korea or Iran to take care of, He is already allowing foreign governments to destroy our fisheries by overfishing and polution.In my opinion the only thing Mr Obama knows about fishing and fisheries is what is written on a menue.

0 Good Comment?

I for one completly understand why mr Romney would not answer this survey it would only be used to make him look like he is pro industry and would be a environintal threat .the data from any survey can and will be twisted to damage mr romneys reputation .survays are the ammo that was used agains us to disproportionately close fishing in the first place .this is a stupid idea and I am against this politacal nonsense it will back fire on people that want to responsibly utilizeand protect the natural resources .

0 Good Comment?

Al the political trash in the response no answers
Just typical Obama dodging the answer he should be giving
Same old crap special interests pad candidates
Money chests Obama and Romney I'll say one more thing
Romney did not respond cuz he would lie too

0 Good Comment?

Though Synergy poses a great question that should have been asked, I fully disagree that Romney will be less suseptable to the money and influence of big business and special interests. Though the Democrats have certainly shown that they are not immune to those influences, the Republicans have demonstrated that they are the party most willing to allow policy to be driven by $$$. And his blind assumption that Romney's lack of response is better than Obama's response is ludicrous. Romney has shown himself to be a weathervane for the Republican party--herever their whims blow, he points in that direction. And I have not heard a single word from him or his party when it comes to preserving the environment. I usually hear comments from the Republicans and their supporters along the lines that the world is too large to be effected by human activity and the earth exists to be exploited by man. So unless Romney responds, I believe it best to assume the worst from him.

0 Good Comment?

Why should we believe any thing Mr Obama has to say about our oceans and inland waters.He has lied about so many other things how can we believe his on this issue. Mr Obama answers questions with answers that he thinks we want to hear,he will do and say anything to keep his current job as president after all it is a step up from anything that he has done in the past. I complement Sport Fishing Magazine for attempting to get both parties to speak on the subject but all you got was a disapointing refusal from Romney and BS from Obama At least we can all see what kind of support we will have from our friends in Washington,OUR COUNTRY IS IN A REAL MESS ---GOD HELP US.

0 Good Comment?

Thank you, President Obama for the answers to the questions. You do NOT have my vote!

Your administration’s intent seems to be more focused on controlling, restricting, and limiting rather than applying appropriate and pertinent science to environmental and sporting concerns. Money driven special interest agendas steer our state and federal governments nowadays, with NOAA being just one example of the corruption affecting our right to enjoy our resources.

Whatever President Romney will do, or would have stated here, is better than the heading you have us on.

Considering this is a federal level presidential campaign interview, why didn't SF pose this question: In the new administration, what will the US be doing to address the decimation of the world’s pelagic fish stocks by foreign countries?

+1 Good Comment?

I do not feel comfortable with anything Obama says ,he does not
Know beans about fish and will tell you what ever you want to hear .
This is an election year and he has been campaigning all his life and has not kept any of his promises .Does not hold water !

0 Good Comment?

Thanks for the answers.. we just need to make sure there is follow thru and not just a bunch of unkept promises

0 Good Comment?

Thanks for the answers.. we just need to make sure there is follow thru and not just a bunch of unkept promises

0 Good Comment?

Where did Obama get all this knowlage on these matters. He is the most uneducated president we have. He has good writers to write his comments.
Do you really think he knowes anything about the conservation that has been going on in the last 30 years. I don't think so.
He's just looking for votes.
O yes Rommey would of done the same also.

0 Good Comment?

No mention of the pending asian Carp invasion that would kill the great Lakes fisheries.

0 Good Comment?

Lots of hot air, non answers and promises. Nothing new here, just typical political BS with no action on behalf on anglers.

0 Good Comment?

So it sounds as though nothing has changed.

NOAA was taken to court by the RFA for using "flawed data" to initiate emergency closures. What ever happened to the NOAA investigation of their enforcement department destroying documents and the misuse of funds obtained from fishing penalties?

Now each state has been forced to initiate a fishing license / registry program for salt-water fishing. How many people have been contacted to supply current fishing information?

Louisiana & Texas are extending their territorial waters to over-ride federal restrictions.

If you believe these statements, I've got some ocean front property in Nebraska that I'd like to sell you.

George Neuberger

+1 Good Comment?

President Obama, we need fast action on the Idle Iron issue, before more rigs are senselessly removed from the gulf, once they are gone they are gone. Moratorium now! I am a diehard and faithful supporter of President Obama and am believing you will direct some attention and resources to this issue YESTERDAY!

-1 Good Comment?

Thank you, President Obama for the answers to the questions. You have my vote!

+1 Good Comment?

And yet Obama knew that large campaign donator, EDF wanted Jane Lubchenco, their Vice Chair at the time, to be put into the position of leadership over the Federal Fisheries, so as to promote their Catch Share scheme from as they said, the "Top-Down". She had to resign from EDF to get the appointment, and quickly proceeded to spend hundreds of millions of dollars pushing this agenda.

This past 3 1/2 years has seen more closures and Catch Share schemes imposed, despite the great growth in most fish stocks, and the declaration that Overfishing has ended! Access by the private angler to recreational saltwater fishing has diminished despite some of the best fish stocks in decades! Since his administration allowed this, is he now saying he's going to change it? Maybe this is simply some of the "Change" he is waiting for his second term to get around to!

+1 Good Comment?
post a comment
  • Anonymous comments will appear after it has been approved by a moderator.
  • Login or Register Now for your comment to appear immediately.
Please note: your comment will appear after it has been approved by a moderator. If you login or register your comment will appear immediately
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use