
I'm not sure how I feel about the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, but I watch its Whale Wars TV show regularly. I also celebrated when a British court dismissed a lawsuit brought against the non-profit group by Maltese tuna wranglers after a Sea Shepherd boat rammed a tuna pen in the Mediterranean, releasing some 800 bluefin tuna.
My first encounter with the Sea Shepherds occurred around 1988 when I was a member of the Gillnet Committee, a group of recreational angling interests and marine scientests brought together by the late California Assemblywoman Doris Allen (R-Cypress). Our goal was to rid California ocean waters of inshore set gillnets, and during one meeting, a member of the Sea Shepherds asked to speak with us. I recall his all-black attire and dedication to ocean conservation. But mostly I remember his polite offer to organize covert, dastardly acts -- such as scuttling gillnet boats as they sat at the dock -- on behalf of our cause. We thanked him for his time, but just as politely declined the offer, being that it was, like, illegal and violent and all.
Assemblywoman Allen eventually went on to author and promote Proposition 132 -- the anti-gillnet initiative -- which, with the help of organizations such as United Anglers of Southern California, was approved by voters during the November 1990 California election and became a state constituional amendment, the first law of its kind in the United States.
While Prop 132 proved to me that you can work within the system to promote fisheries conservation, I still admire the Sea Shepherds' rebellious spunk, but as with a high-spirited horse, always wonder when it will turn its wrath on me. On us. On recreational fishermen.
The group's website says its mission is to end the destruction of habitat and slaughter of wildlife in the world's oceans in order to conserve and protect ecosystems and species. Sounds like our credo. But then it goes on to state that the Sea Shepherds use direct-action tactics to investigate, document, and take action when necessary to expose and confront illegal activities on the high seas.
For now, I think the Sea Shepherds will focus on commercial interests like the bluefin tuna netters, as well as whalers. So law-abiding recreational anglers are safe from their rage (I have visions of the Sea Shepherds' Bob Barker ramming a long-range sportifishing boat off Guadalupe Island). And if the Sea Shepherds' efforts to help bluefin tuna populations pay off, so much the better. And I will continue to watch Whale Wars. Even though Sea Shepherd crew members seem to bumble a lot and are prone to mistakes, mishaps and equipment malfunctions -- many born of the crew's inexperience and lack of training -- I want to believe that they know in their hearts that recreational fishermen were the first marine conservationists. And like the first Sea Shepherd I met in 1988, they should seek to help us, not ram us.
I fish. I fish for big yellowfin tuna. I fish for bluefin tuna. I have no worry about ANY conservation effort knowing that it will be directed at COMMERCIAL operations and if there is any overflow to the individual fisherman then it will affect the commercial operation much worse.
Whaling from a rowboat with hand-thrown harpoons? They're welcome to try it, but for their consumption, not distribution commercially.
The 50's are past. Rape of Mother Nature is no longer acceptable. Sustainability is almost gone. Why deprive those yet to come the resources we enjoy?
JimPea, San Diego, CA
Mr Watson you can not have your cake and eat it too, the TV show is about promoting what the Sea Shepherd does in the hope of gaining public support for its cause. You can not then come out and say that it is just a TV Show as it hits to the core of what you believe in.
For the record I have no issue with sustainable whale harvest and have been fortunate enough to be able to taste whale meat in my travels, just because it is a majestic animal does not make it any less commercially viable and when done in a sustainable manner they are just a big water cow at the end of the day. Your actions are only justified by you and your team not by the millions of people who find your actions distasteful and abhorrent.
I am the REAL Paul Watson! You are a phony, a fake!
Who was that masked man Jim? Please let me know who that person was Jim, because whoever it was they would not have been authorized to have made such statement. Sea Shepherd is an anti-poaching organization. We have not and we do not intervene against legal fishing operations, commercial or recreational.
Captain Paul Watson
Founder and President
Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
Who was that masked man? Jim, just for the record, no real Sea Shepherd representative would have offered to sink any legal registered and legally operated fishing vessel. If you have a name for this person I would very much appreciate it so that I can ensure he/she does not make any such offer to anyone else. Sea Shepherd is an anti-poaching organization.
As for our inexperience. Do not let the TV show mislead you. It is a TV show and the point is to show passionate volunteers struggling to save the whales in the Southern Ocean. Bottom line is that after 8 campaigns to the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary we have not caused a single injury nor have our crew sustained any serious injuries. We have weathered the roughest seas on the planet in the most remote waters on Earth and we have been successful in shutting down illegal Japanese whaling operations.
As Shacklton once observed in response to a criticism that his crew were not professionals, "I don`t want professionals. I want passion."
I could not pay professionals to do what these passionate volunteers do for nothing."
No legal fishing operation need be concerned about Sea Shepherd intervening against their activities.
We are an anti-poaching organization.
What I’ll never get about Sea Shepherd is why they oppose the Canadian seal hunt. The seals up here are *overpopulated* for crying out loud. Oh wait, actually I do get it. Sea Shepherd really isn’t all about conservation.
We are in San Diego trying to keep the City and state from closing a trusted public tidelands beach, which should be impossible, but the City has cultivated a tame harbor seal population and believes the tourist revenue is essential. Animal Rights activists want the public barred, which is where spearfishermen are suing because the Trust that created the protected beach stipulated convenient access would be guaranteed for fishing, right out of the State Constitution. The Coastal Commission, of all people, is ready to grant a permit to cordon off the beach with an "advisory rope barrier" every day of the year.
We get regular visits from Sea Shepherd operatives out to help undo the long standing shared use policy and practice here. They yell, they wave signs, they block the stairs. Yes, they will turn on anybody if there is publicity and power to come of it.
The court did not absolve the sea shepherds of wrongdoing, the court said the UK was not the proper court to hear the case. here is the court document. http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=%2Few%2Fcases%2FEWHC%2FAdml...